SFL Friday -- Southern Nights (and Grouts) Edition
in 11th Circuit, Friday
Similar pages:
- Blog of law articles: J.B. Harris: A Day Late, A COBRA Short.
- Blog of law articles: Don't Like Arbitration Award? Have District Court Confirm It First.
- Blog of law articles: Do You Get Excited By Noncompetes?
- Blog of law articles: What Did You Do During Your "Gap Period"?
- Blog of law articles: Are There Any Lawyers Left in Town?
- Blog of law articles: 11th Circuit Affirms Halliburton Dismissal on Political Question Grounds

Hi kids, yes it's Friday and yes I'm packing it in early. In fact, I'm taking the whole day off.
I hope you all get to sneak out early today too.
Did you all see this 11th Circuit opinion released yesterday on "late" discovery and amending the pleadings?
First of all, I love the name -- Southern Grouts.
Nothing namby-pamby like "Twombly" -- this is a Venetian Salami-worthy casename, ready to stand the test of time!
In a nutshell, the plaintiff took a corporate rep deposition after the date to amend pleadings, then sought to amend the complaint one month later, citing "new" discovery obtained at the deposition.
The district court refused, and it was affirmed by the 11th, in a pretty tough opinion. As part of the litany of reasons plaintiff's counsel lacked "diligence" on this issue, the 11th even noted that the corporate rep depo was moved once by plaintiff's counsel. That plus "waiting" a month to amend.
While overall I understand the court's affirmance, especially since plaintiff's counsel may have already had this information, I wonder whether the opinion is a bit too rarefied and perhaps lacks an appreciation of real-life practitioner concerns and how litigation unfolds in a busy law office on a daily basis.
Is moving to amend one month after an important deposition "waiting"? It takes some time to even get the transcript, then you have to amend the complaint and draft the motion. I don't know how much actual "waiting" was involved.
And depos are often rescheduled -- particularly important ones like a 30(b)(6), for reasons that have nothing to do with whether or not the lawyer really wants to take the deposition.
That said, I do agree that if you are already outside the amendment deadline you need to move quickly and probably should not be rescheduling the deposition except for emergencies.
In all, the opinion is worth a read to keep us all aware of how important these deadlines can be, and what "good cause" is and isn't to the 11th nowadays.
Hmmm, maybe I'll come in this morning after all.
Ok, now I'm officially worried -- I'll check in with you all later today.
More related web entries for - SFL Friday -- Southern Nights (and Grouts) Edition:
- undefined
- Are There Any Lawyers Left in Town?
- 11th Circuit Affirms Halliburton Dismissal on Political Question Grounds
- Barry Mukamal Update!
- Keep Your Cards And Letters Coming!
- 11th Circuit Has Not Yet Overturned Liberty 6 Convictions
- Judge Carnes Keeps His Eye On The Sparrow
- Yes, 11th Circuit, We Know You're There.
- SFL Monday -- The Path Life Leads You.
- Judge Ryskamp Affirmed In Reducing FLSA Attorney's Fee Request
- UF Frat Permitted to Be Most Boring In Nation!
- 11th Circuit Tip To Aspiring Litigants -- Don't Get Assaulted At A Strip Club
- Gather Round, Children!
- Judge Carnes Continues Trend of Discursive Opening Paragraphs
- Has The Eleventh Circuit "Channeled" Classic Styx?
- SFL Friday -- My Neuron Loves Your Neuron Edition.
- Today's Digital Dumptruck
- Tuesday Roundup -- This One's For George.
- Judge Frank M. Hull Has A New Look?
- Judge Carnes Fiddles; Meanwhile, Our Schools.....
- SFL Friday -- O Canada Labor Day Weekend Edition
- SFL Friday -- Happy Nazi Gnomes Edition.
- SFL Friday -- Wet, Hot and Delightfully Dangerous
- SFL Friday -- So, Did Anyone Die Recently?
- SFL Friday -- "You Got To Shake It Baby, You Got To Shake It Baby, You Got To Shake It"
- SFL Friday -- Tim and I, Down The Telegraph Road.
- SFL Friday -- Before The Flood
- SFL Friday -- Wet Hot American Weekend.
This entry was posted on at 2:26 AM and is filed under 11th Circuit, Friday. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
The AFL-CIO blog claims a new study shows the excise tax on "Cadillac" health plans would affect significantly more non-union w...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...