When a Facebook Friend Request is Against the Law
Similar pages:
- Blog of law articles: 10 Do's and Don'ts for Divorce in the Internet Age
- Blog of law articles: Divorce in the Facebook Era
- Blog of law articles: Facebook & Twitter causing Divorces?
- Blog of law articles: What you text can and will be used against you.
- Blog of law articles: Why are you on Facebook?
- Blog of law articles: The Role of new Technologies in Divorce Cases.
While it is important to realize that the actual act of requesting that someone be your Facebook "friend" may seem completely innocuous, a judge may have little patience for it if there is an outstanding restraining order between the two individuals. If you are a party on either side of a restraining order, contact online, such as a friend request, instant message, email, or otherwise, is considered to be contact which may violate "no contact" provisions of most restraining orders.
More related web entries for - When a Facebook Friend Request is Against the Law:
- undefined
- Why are you on Facebook?
- The Role of new Technologies in Divorce Cases.
- When a Tweet is a Threat
- There Was Another Lawyer Who "Attended" Obama's Fundraiser
- Can a Restraining Order be Permanent?
- What you text can and will be used against you.
- What is the Automatic Restraining Order (Supplemental Probate Court Rule 411)?
- The Honeymooners' Divorce: Collaborative Law, Mediation or Litigation - Part III
- Restraining Orders are not Force Fields
This entry was posted on at 2:15 PM and is filed under facebook, internet, restraining orders. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
So Reverend Cutie Reverend Cutie Reverend Cutie Reverend Cutie Reverend Cutie everyone! I'm hesitant to add to the massive amount of dig...
#1 by Greg Prosmushkin - August 18, 2020 at 2:22 PM