2 new project regulations on water resources management in Québec
Similar pages:
- Blog of law articles: Arbitration between Montréal and Génieau for cancelled water management contract
- Blog of law articles: Conference: Shale gas development and water protection in Canada
- Blog of law articles: Environmental flow protection in Québec
- Blog of law articles: Water case law in Québec 9: Validity of a municipal regulation protecting riparian areas
- Blog of law articles: Water case law in Québec 8: Demolition of a new encroachement in the St Lawrence River riparian zone
- Blog of law articles: Québec water case law 21: The Court of Appeal upholds the validity of municipal by-laws for riparian zone protection
The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations.
One is to amend the Regulation respecting the application of section 32 of the Environment Quality Act, the Groundwater Catchment Regulation and the Regulation respecting waste water disposal systems for isolated dwellings. According to the introductory text, the main purpose for these amendments is to relax regulatory controls on businesses and natural resources exploitation:
«The proposed amendments would reduce the administrative requirements related to certain waterworks and sewer projects having little environmental impact. (...) Private institutions, businesses and industries, that own such systems, would also benefit from the proposed amendments since they would no longer be required to obtain a prior authorization to carry out certain water or sewer main replacement work. In addition, enterprises that carry out forest management, mining exploration, transportation or dam work and that must set up temporary industrial camps of 80 persons or fewer would no longer be required to submit plans and specifications to the Minister and obtain the Minister’s authorization before installing waterworks and sewer systems.»
The other projected regulation propose a framework for the authorization of certain projects to transfer water out of the St. Lawrence River Basin. After a very quick preliminary review, one question that can be raised on this regulation project pertains to the limits on access to information regarding the transfer projects (see sections 4 and 5 in fine). For example, why should access be denied to a narrative description explaining why no alternative reasonably accessible supply source is capable of meeting drinking water needs? Or why deny access to a narrative description explaining why the water transfer is necessary?
Could the transparency of the process under the Ontario regulation for transfers outside the Great Lakes St. Lawrence River Basin be a source of inspiration? The website set up with respect to one such transfer for the York region provides a whealth of information on all aspects of the projected transfer.
The contacts for comments on the project regulations are provided both on the Ministry's website and in the texts published in the Gazette Officielle.
More related web entries for - 2 new project regulations on water resources management in Québec:
- undefined
- Québec water case law 21: The Court of Appeal upholds the validity of municipal by-laws for riparian zone protection
- Water case law in Québec 7: Class action for contamination of municipal groundwater sources
- Report on the implementation of the Québec Groundwater Catchment Regulation
- Federal Bill C-26: new restrictions on transboundary water tranfers?
- Water case law in Québec 20: Municipal liability further to floods
- Water case law in Québec 6: Municipal responsibility for watercourse maintenance
- Hydraulic fracturing from shale gas exploitation pollutes drinking water
- Environmental flows in the UK: ecosystems vs. humans
- Water resources pricing in Québec
- Water case law in Québec 5: is there an increase in the enforcement of fish habitat protection?
- U.S. congressional committee report on chemichals used in fracking fluids
- Report of the Commission on Cyanobacteria in Québec
- Shale gas exploitation and public interest in Texas
- Federal decision not to add the Gulf of St. Lawrence Winter Skate to the List of Species at risk
- Québec water case law 19: interpreting section 56 of the Municipal Powers Act
- Confirmation of agreement on the management of Lake Champlain
- Water case law in Québec 4: defining fish habitat
- Water stress in +2C vs. +4C climate changed worlds
- Québec water case law 18: Authorisation denied for a class action further to rains and sewer backflow
- Québec water case law 17: «Lower land is subject to receiving water flowing onto it naturally from higher land»
- Modifications to the Dam Safety Regulation
- Water case law in Québec 3: groundwater extraction under the agricultural zoning regime
- Québec water case law 16: Causality and trout mortality
- Special issue on water law
- Water case law in Québec 1: the undead property of water
- Public interest in the Québec water allocation regime
- Québec water caselaw 15: Earthworks in a wetland without a valid municipal authorisation
This entry was posted on at 3:22 AM and is filed under Québec, St. Lawrence River. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
I know how much Judge Silverman loves to preserve and celebrate our heritage, particularly as it relates to the courts and our rich South Fl...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
#1 by jaylen watkins - November 22, 2011 at 2:57 AM
This move of water and sewer department will benefit people.
Sample leases