Water case law in Québec 3: groundwater extraction under the agricultural zoning regime
Similar pages:
- Blog of law articles: Québec water case law 10: Municipal responsibility for disgorgement of septic tanks
- Blog of law articles: Water case law in Québec 9: Validity of a municipal regulation protecting riparian areas
- Blog of law articles: Water case law in Québec 8: Demolition of a new encroachement in the St Lawrence River riparian zone
- Blog of law articles: Québec water case law 21: The Court of Appeal upholds the validity of municipal by-laws for riparian zone protection
- Blog of law articles: Water case law in Québec 7: Class action for contamination of municipal groundwater sources
- Blog of law articles: Water case law in Québec 20: Municipal liability further to floods
In Québec, a new groundwater abstraction may have to be authorised under two governmental authorisation regimes.
The first regime is provided for by the Groundwater Catchment Regulation and generally targets all groundwater extraction projects in Quebec.
The second authorisation regime, which is provided by the Act respecting the preservation of agricultural land and agricultural activities (ARPALAA), is not primarily concerned with groundwater management and is only applicable in rural areas.
Nevertheless, the ARPALAA has impacts on groundwater management in Québec. Some of these impacts are described in this article.
The purpose of the ARPALAA is to preserve agriculture and agricultural land. Essentially, the ARPALAA is a land use management statute that generally prohibits any person, except with the authorisation of the Commission de protection du territoire agricole (CPTAQ), from using real estate property for purposes other than agricultural activities in designated agricultural regions.
Hence, if someone wants to extract groundwater in zoned agricultural land, the CPTAQ has to pre-authorise the extraction project. However, CPTAQ's decision, whether positive or negative, can be contested before the Administrative Tribunal of Québec (ATQ).
In Vergers Leahy inc. v. Fédération de l'UPA de St-Jean-Valleyfield (in French), the Appellant requests CPTAQ's authorisation to sink a well to produce bottled water in agricultural zone. The CPTAQ rejects the application and the Appellant contests this decision before the ATQ. In this instance, the parties request permission to file new evidence.
Among the many issues pertaining to administrative law decided in this appeal, the Court of Appeal crucially delineates the cases in which new evidence can be brought before the ATQ in appeal of the CPTAQ.
The Court establishes that the ATQ can only consider new evidence when there is an error in law or a determining error in fact in CPTAQ's original decision, in conformity with section 21.4 of ARPALAA.
As a result of all this, a refusal to authorise a groundwater abstraction project stands.
More related web entries for - Water case law in Québec 3: groundwater extraction under the agricultural zoning regime:
- undefined
- Water case law in Québec 20: Municipal liability further to floods
- Water case law in Québec 6: Municipal responsibility for watercourse maintenance
- Water case law in Québec 5: is there an increase in the enforcement of fish habitat protection?
- Québec water case law 19: interpreting section 56 of the Municipal Powers Act
- Water case law in Québec 4: defining fish habitat
- Québec water case law 18: Authorisation denied for a class action further to rains and sewer backflow
- Québec water case law 17: «Lower land is subject to receiving water flowing onto it naturally from higher land»
- Québec water case law 16: Causality and trout mortality
- Water case law in Québec 1: the undead property of water
- Québec water caselaw 15: Earthworks in a wetland without a valid municipal authorisation
- Québec water case law 14: Failure to obtain an authorisation to discharge waste water
- Québec water case law 13: Defective septic tank
- Québec water case law 12: The «sleeping giant» v. hydroelectric development?
- Québec water case law 11: obligations under a commercial lease and the cost of a well
- Follow-up on the sleeping giant in Québec water case law 12
- Québec water case law 21: The Court of Appeal upholds the validity of municipal by-laws for riparian zone protection
- Water case law in Québec 7: Class action for contamination of municipal groundwater sources
- Report on the implementation of the Québec Groundwater Catchment Regulation
- Federal Bill C-26: new restrictions on transboundary water tranfers?
- Hydraulic fracturing from shale gas exploitation pollutes drinking water
- Environmental flows in the UK: ecosystems vs. humans
- Water resources pricing in Québec
- U.S. congressional committee report on chemichals used in fracking fluids
- Report of the Commission on Cyanobacteria in Québec
- Shale gas exploitation and public interest in Texas
- Federal decision not to add the Gulf of St. Lawrence Winter Skate to the List of Species at risk
- Confirmation of agreement on the management of Lake Champlain
This entry was posted on at 12:53 PM and is filed under Case Law, Groundwater, Québec, Québec water case law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
The AFL-CIO blog claims a new study shows the excise tax on "Cadillac" health plans would affect significantly more non-union w...