Report of the Commission on Cyanobacteria in Québec
Similar pages:
- Blog of law articles: Arbitration between Montréal and Génieau for cancelled water management contract
- Blog of law articles: Conference: Shale gas development and water protection in Canada
- Blog of law articles: Environmental flow protection in Québec
- Blog of law articles: Water case law in Québec 9: Validity of a municipal regulation protecting riparian areas
- Blog of law articles: Water case law in Québec 8: Demolition of a new encroachement in the St Lawrence River riparian zone
- Blog of law articles: Québec water case law 21: The Court of Appeal upholds the validity of municipal by-laws for riparian zone protection
The report (in French) on lakes and cyanobacteria in Québec by the National Assembly Commission on Transports and the Environment has been released at the beginning of December (previous blog post).
As with the consultation process, the report feels slightly underwhelming. It constitutes more a synthesis of what is known and acknowledged as necessary for better water management with respect to cyanobacteria than a significant innovative proposition for the future. This does not detract from the value of the recommendations presented in the report, among which are the following:
1 - Confirm and assign with more precision the respective responsibilities among stakeholders involved in water management. On this subject, one of the more focussed comments of the Commission is worth quoting because it highlights the tension between, on one hand, homogenisation through integration, and on the other hand, subsidiarity through delegation as well as variability due to adaptation to local conditions - «Cependant, la réglementation sur la gestion de l’eau et de ses bandes riveraines est très variable d’une municipalité à l’autre, voire au sein d’une même MRC. De plus, certains propriétaires riverains estiment avoir des droits acquis qui échappent aux compétences municipales. La Commission souhaite que le gouvernement adopte des mesures concrètes qui visent à harmoniser les règlements municipaux au sein d’un même bassin versant. Il devrait, dans cet exercice, tenir compte des disparités économiques et territoriales et prévoir un soutien technique propre à l’application des règlements. Enfin, on devrait poursuivre par ces réglementations les objectifs énoncés dans les plans directeurs de l’eau.» (p.4)
3 - Grant governmental funding necessary for the realisation of water master plans. The source of funding should come from the fees paid for withdrawing water.
4 - Integrate the water master plans with the RCM Land Use Planning and Development Plan (see the Act respecting Land use planning and development).
8 - The Québec government should provide support to the municipalities and regional county municipality for the implementation of laws and regulations on water management.
9 & 16 - The government should review the criteria for the width of the riparian protection areas to limit phosphorous inputs.
12 - A financial support programme to help poorer segments of the population respect regulatory standards on sceptic tanks should be put in place by the government.
13 & 14 - The revision of the Regulation respecting waste water disposal systems for isolated dwellings should be prioritised with a view to increasing the phosphorous retention capacity of regulated sceptic tanks.
15 - The government should promote a sustainable model for agriculture that takes into account the water support capacity for phosphorous inputs. This recommendation is concomitant with decrees amending the farming insurance programme that push agriculture towards ever higher productivity.
More related web entries for - Report of the Commission on Cyanobacteria in Québec:
- undefined
- Québec water case law 21: The Court of Appeal upholds the validity of municipal by-laws for riparian zone protection
- Water case law in Québec 7: Class action for contamination of municipal groundwater sources
- Report on the implementation of the Québec Groundwater Catchment Regulation
- Federal Bill C-26: new restrictions on transboundary water tranfers?
- Water case law in Québec 20: Municipal liability further to floods
- Water case law in Québec 6: Municipal responsibility for watercourse maintenance
- Hydraulic fracturing from shale gas exploitation pollutes drinking water
- Environmental flows in the UK: ecosystems vs. humans
- Water resources pricing in Québec
- Water case law in Québec 5: is there an increase in the enforcement of fish habitat protection?
- U.S. congressional committee report on chemichals used in fracking fluids
- Shale gas exploitation and public interest in Texas
- Federal decision not to add the Gulf of St. Lawrence Winter Skate to the List of Species at risk
- Québec water case law 19: interpreting section 56 of the Municipal Powers Act
- Confirmation of agreement on the management of Lake Champlain
- Water case law in Québec 4: defining fish habitat
- Water stress in +2C vs. +4C climate changed worlds
- Québec water case law 18: Authorisation denied for a class action further to rains and sewer backflow
- Québec water case law 17: «Lower land is subject to receiving water flowing onto it naturally from higher land»
- Modifications to the Dam Safety Regulation
- Water case law in Québec 3: groundwater extraction under the agricultural zoning regime
- 2 new project regulations on water resources management in Québec
- Québec water case law 16: Causality and trout mortality
- Special issue on water law
- Water case law in Québec 1: the undead property of water
- Public interest in the Québec water allocation regime
- Québec water caselaw 15: Earthworks in a wetland without a valid municipal authorisation
This entry was posted on at 7:37 PM and is filed under Québec, water resources quality. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
I know how much Judge Silverman loves to preserve and celebrate our heritage, particularly as it relates to the courts and our rich South Fl...