Taking Google Scholar Out For A Test Drive.
Similar pages:
- Blog of law articles: Ode to Catherine Van Asselt
- Blog of law articles: SFL Monday -- Lew Freeman Wades Into It.
- Blog of law articles: Rothstein Scorecard -- Who Represents Who?
- Blog of law articles: SFL Friday -- "Mad Men" And Scott Rothstein
- Blog of law articles: Who Are "The Others"?
- Blog of law articles: This is Good Publicity??

Ok, let's get Rothstein out of the way:
John Pacenti and the Herald report on how Scott allegedly bilked this investor just weeks before he took off for Morocco.
The purported "investment opportunity" is insultingly stupid:
The deal offered a return of eight percent per month for the following four months. It involved a purported lawsuit against California-based Dole, which Faulkner said had settled for $500 million in the face of accusations that it had overstated the percentage of pineapple in juices it sold to school districts.So this is a secret whistleblower action -- possibly unfiled -- in which Dole forks over a half billion over mislabeling the content of its pineapple juice? And for some reason Dole wants to pay this half billion out over time?
In what imaginary world do cases like this exist?
But you know, the kids still got some juice and that's the important thing.
Oy what a goyisher kup.
But Scottie says he doesn't know this particular investor and I for one believe him:
Marc, why is your client still giving interviews to the Herald?"I keep seeing names on the Internet who were alleged investors of me and I have no idea who they are,'' Rothstein told The Herald on Thursday. "There are sublayers of people doing very, very bad things to people in my name, so we shall see.''
"Not that I didn't do something wrong, and I'm back here to fix it,'' he said. "I made a decision to come back from Morocco and do the right thing. I know people are laughing and saying he can't repay these people, and they are wrong.''
Also Scott, people are not laughing over whether you can repay the investors -- there's plenty of other things about this fiasco to laugh about, believe me.
Alright, let's move on.
So two lawyers at Mayer Brown recently wrote about County of Nassau v. Hotels.com, where the 2d Circuit raised the issue of CAFA jurisdiction nostra sponte (take that, Latin nerds!) and remanded the case to the district court "to determine whether class certification is appropriate" in order to determine whether CAFA jurisdiction exists.
To learn more, I went ahead and tried to pull up the 2d Circuit opinion on Google Scholar and found it quite easily and for free.
Your move, oh Lexis lady.
More related web entries for - Taking Google Scholar Out For A Test Drive.:
- undefined
- Blockbuster Allegations At RRA!
- Let's Look At Stu Rosenfeldt's Campaign Contributions!
- More Hilarity from The RRA Vaults!
- This One's For You, Scottie!!
- A Chestnut Pulled From The Hilarious RRA Pleadings File!
- A Day Without Scott Rothstein?
- Rothstein Scorecard -- Who Represents Who?
- A Thanksgiving Cornucopia of Kim Rothstein Photographs!
- Scotty's Greatest Hits: A Look Back At Rothstein's Real Cases!
- "A Town Full of Thieves"
- A Scott and Kim Rothstein Fever Dream
- How Not To Run A Law Firm.
- SFL Monday -- The Path Life Leads You.
- SFL Friday -- "Mad Men" And Scott Rothstein
- My Kind of Federal Judge!
- A Children's Treasury of Kim Rothstein Photographs!
- 3d DCA Watch -- Have I Died And Gone to Heaven?
- RRA Update -- Still Waiting For Ruling On Emergency Enlargement
- Has the RRA Media Strategy Been Successful?
- SFL Friday -- Hitting The Curves Weekend
- Memories....
- "A Good Lawyer Knows The Law, A Great Lawyer Knows The Judge"
- Why Don't You Do Right?
- 3d DCA Watch -- Worth The Wait.
- Parsing The Fake Judge Marra Order
- Hard To Pick Just One!
- Who Are "The Others"?
This entry was posted on at 6:03 AM and is filed under CAFA, Catherine Van Asselt, Google Scholar, John Pacenti, Lexis, Marc Nurik, Mayer Brown, Scott Rothstein. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.
VIP Followers
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
The AFL-CIO blog claims a new study shows the excise tax on "Cadillac" health plans would affect significantly more non-union w...