Environmental flows in Alberta (Canada) and tar sands exploitation
Similar pages:
- Blog of law articles: Sounds familiar? Water law's implementation deficiencies in Alberta
- Blog of law articles: Drought in Alberta (Canada)
- Blog of law articles: Conference: Shale gas development and water protection in Canada
- Blog of law articles: Canada vs the human right to water and projected trade agreement with the European Union
- Blog of law articles: Deluge of reports on water management issues in Canada
- Blog of law articles: Federal Bill S-11 to improve drinking water on aboriginal land
In the last 10 years, Alberta has experienced an economic boom based on tar sand exploitation. The main tar sand deposits currently exploited are situated in Northern Alberta, in the Athabaska river basin, which is tributary to the Mackenzie river, one of the last great North American rivers left in a relatively pristine state (here is a map of the North American watersheds).
Tar sand exploitation consumes large volumes of water. To extract 1 oil barrel from the sands, a water input of 2 to 4.5 barrels is required depending on the method. The used water is loaded with toxic contaminants and almost all of it ends up in tailing ponds.
Alberta has defined a framework that indicates how much water tar sand companies can remove from the Athabasca River in order to foster economic development while ensuring healthy aquatic ecosystems in conformity with the provincial water strategy (see p.10-11).
Recently, the Cumulative Environmental Management Association (CEMA) has released a report developing recommendations for a Phase 2 Water Management Framework that will prescribe when and how much water can be withdrawn from the lower Athabasca river for cumulative tar sand exploitation. According to the report summary:
«Key lessons and principles that emerged from this exploration, and are strongly recommended to form the basis of the final water management framework, include:
• Water withdrawal rules should generally be more restrictive as flows decrease.
• Although there is a need to provide instream flow protection throughout the entire year, there should be a hierarchy of protection across seasonal time periods: 1)midwinter, 2) late winter/early spring, 3) fall/early winter, and 4) summer.
• A specified EBF threshold is a means of providing increased protection during low flow events and refinements to its application on the Lower Athabasca River should continue to be explored.
• Mitigation using off-stream storage (or other equivalent approach to mitigation) is a necessary means of facilitating an effective water management framework.»
This report has been received with some reservations. The Prairie Chapter of the Sierra Club of Canada has set up the Got Thirst? Campaign that warns of the perils of water resources over-exploitation.
More related web entries for - Environmental flows in Alberta (Canada) and tar sands exploitation:
- undefined
- Federal Bill C-26: new restrictions on transboundary water tranfers?
- Strengthening Legal Protection for Canada's Drinking Water
- The Living Water Policy Project
- Review of Policy proposal for BC Water Sustainability Act
- Sounds familiar? Water law's implementation deficiencies in Alberta
- 2011 Canadian Bar Association Conference on Water
- Drought in Alberta (Canada)
- Ontario aims at becoming the leading clean water jurisdiction in North America
- 2010 Freshwater Summit
- Canada loves it some EFCA?
- POLIS policy paper on public trust doctine in British Columbia
- On the triage of species: which ones do we want extinct?
- McGill University Conference on a New Canadian Water Policy
- Article on the human right to water in the Canadian Charter of Rigths and Freedoms
- The water energy nexus is still under the spotlight
- The good side of the water energy nexus: Viruses produce hydrogene from water?
- HRBA to gas?
- Construction of the Roghun power station in Tajikistan: The Water-Energy Nexus in Central Asia
- Water rights as constraint on nuclear plant project in Utah
- Financial risks in water utilities: Report from Ceres
- Québec water case law 12: The «sleeping giant» v. hydroelectric development?
- Water Energy regulation by international law in offshore operations
- Article on Water Energy Nexus
This entry was posted on at 5:39 AM and is filed under Alberta, Canada, Environmental Flows, Tar Sands, Water Energy Nexus. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
I know how much Judge Silverman loves to preserve and celebrate our heritage, particularly as it relates to the courts and our rich South Fl...