Strengthening Legal Protection for Canada's Drinking Water
in Canada, drinking water
On 17 May 2010, FLOW - Forum for Leadership on Water released a report on strenghtening the legal protection for Canada's drinking water.
Some of the challenges highlighted by the report to justify improved protection for drinking water in Canada are:
- In April 2008, the Canadian Medical Association reported that there were 1,776 drinking water advisories in effect across Canada;
- On 30 April 2010, there were 116 First Nations communities across Canada under a Drinking Water Advisory;
- An estimated 20–40% of all rural wells in Canada have nitrate concentrations or coliform bacteria counts in excess of drinking water guidelines;
- Half of the Canadian jurisdictions lack mandatory testing for chemical contamination of drinking water and over half do not require advanced water treatment for surface water;
- Many of the parameters in the voluntary pan-Canadian drinking water guidelines are up to 1000 times weaker than at least one of the other corresponding European standards or Australian guidelines.
To address these fundamental problems, the Report makes the following recommendations:
1 - The federal government could replace the Canadian Guidelines for
Drinking Water Quality with a Safe Drinking Water Act that has health-based long term objectives and legally binding minimum national standards and regulations;
2 - The federal government should ensure the drinking water standards are at least equal to the highest standards in other industrialized nations;
3 - The federal government should take steps to provide resources and support for safe drinking water on federal lands and all First Nations reserves;
4 - Establish consistent standards and reporting mechanisms to increase transparency about drinking water and wastewater systems, notably through a publicly available annual report to Parliament.
This entry was posted on at 2:30 AM and is filed under Canada, drinking water. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
The AFL-CIO blog claims a new study shows the excise tax on "Cadillac" health plans would affect significantly more non-union w...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...