Should I bring my new Significant Other or my Children to Family Court with me?
Similar pages:
- Blog of law articles: Custody Reform: H.1306 & H.2684 - Is Changing the "Best Interest" Standard Necessary?
- Blog of law articles: Custody Reform: S.847 – Shared Custody Above All Else?
- Blog of law articles: Custody Reform: S.659 – Change that Goes too Far?
- Blog of law articles: Custody Reform: The Current State of Massachusetts Child Custody Law
- Blog of law articles: Custody Reform: What is it?
- Blog of law articles: 5 Worst Divorce Mistakes - MISTAKE #1 "My kids have a right to know what's happening."
Bringing a Significant Other:
In most cases having a third party in the courthouse (especially a significant other) inflames the other party and makes settlement less likely. While this is not always the case, the risk of making settlement more difficult is usually not worth the benefit of having a third party there.
Also, court is relatively boring. Your significant other will be able to wait with you in the courthouse but he/she will not be able to attend any family service meetings (i.e. required mediation prior to the court hearing). Court involves a lot of waiting around and there is usually something better that people can be doing with their time. For these reasons I usually recommend that clients come alone to court, but in the end it is your call.
Bringing your Children:
Whether or not the hearing involves your children bringing them to court with you is a bad idea for numerous reasons.
1. There is a saying that in criminal court we see bad people acting their best, and in family court we see good people acting their worst. Family court is a stressful place and oftentimes involves very personal and emotional issues. Exposing your children to this is unnecessary and can be damaging psychologically.
2. There is nothing for children to do in the courthouse. These buildings are not designed with children in mind and are not fun places to be. Your children will be able to wait with you in the courthouse but they will not be able to attend any family service meetings (i.e. required mediation prior to the court hearing) and they are typically not allowed in the courtrooms. Court involves a lot of waiting around and children will be very bored.
3. In the event the case does involve your children, it is even more damaging to have them in court. Children pick up on more than most people give them credit for, and knowing that a court hearing is happening (never-mind being there) can be very stressful for children. Children will take responsibility for the outcome even though they have no control over it and blame themselves if their parent is unhappy. Don't place this burden on your child.
4. Finally, there is no added value to having your children in court. In the unlikely event that the Judge wants family service to speak to your children, you will be given the opportunity to come back with them. Having them there at the time of hearing exposes them to unnecessary stress without any potential benefit.
For more information about best practices to protect your children from the detrimental affects of court actions between parents read the following brochure: Planning for Shared Parenting: A Guide for Parents Living Apart.
More related web entries for - Should I bring my new Significant Other or my Children to Family Court with me?:
- undefined
- 5 Worst Divorce Mistakes - MISTAKE #1 "My kids have a right to know what's happening."
- If I leave the House, will I lose my Kids?
- Can DCF records be used in my Custody Case?
- We agreed to a new Parenting Plan; should we go back to Court?
- Should Parenting Plans include Holiday schedules?
- What is a Caregiver Authorization?
- Does a Criminal Record affect Child Custody?
- What's in a Name? - The Problem with Labeling Parents "Custodial Parent" vs. "Visiting Parent"
- Can I Prevent my Ex from Moving Our Children if they Still Live in-State?
- What is a Parenting Plan? What is the best Parenting Plan for my children?
- What is Nesting and Why Would I try It?
- Could I be Forced to Pay Child Support for someone else's Child?
- Divorce and Taxes: Issue #3. Child Dependency Exemptions
- Dramatic Impact of Mediation on Children of Divorce
- Is it Possible to have More than Two Parents?
- Can I be sued for Divorce in Massachusetts if I don't live there but my spouse does?
- Most "Non-Custodial" Parents can still be significantly Involved in their Childrens' Lives
- What happens to my case if I move out of state?
- What is Parental Alienation?
- Are there any provisions of a Separation Agreement then must Merge?
- Who Gets Hurt when You Play Telephone with Your Kids?
- I'm Married but my Husband is not the Father of my Child; What Now?
- What isn't a Parent Coordinator?
- What is a Parent Coordinator?
- What does it mean to be a Father?
- Since we have No-Fault Divorce, how about No-Fault Custody?
- Should Parenting Plans change with the age of the children?
This entry was posted on at 8:28 AM and is filed under child custody, children, Courts, divorce, Probate and Family Court, significant others. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
The AFL-CIO blog claims a new study shows the excise tax on "Cadillac" health plans would affect significantly more non-union w...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...