Showing posts with label Mott's strike. Show all posts
Mott's strike: Day 100
Today marks day 100 of the Mott's strike. The pro-union writer, Michael Winship, does a pretty good job of outlining the economics of this strike pitting a corporate giant in Plano, Texas against the workers of a facility born in western New York that dates back to 1842. Our previous posts are here, here, here, here and here.
Mott's strike continues
Good reporting of labor disputes is rare. This Steven Greenhouse piece in the New York Times is a good one detailing the 3+ month Mott's strike and the reason its an important dispute. The company, despite record profits, seeks to reduce wages and claims the employees are overpaid compared to others in the same area.
Mott's strike continues
Mott's workers represented by the RWDSU remain on strike as the harvest season approaches. The company wants concessions, the union is resisting claiming the company made record profits. The apple pickers are crossing the picket line, and thats not the only bad news for the union. Texas Federal Judge Jorge A. Solis (Bush 43 appointee) has enjoined the union and it supporters from placing union supporting stickers on Mott's products in supermarkets because it violates the federal anti-tampering laws. This is a really creative attack on union economic pressure, and a teachable moment for my labor law class.
Mott's strike
The plant that makes Mott's applesauce is on strike. Mott's is owned by The Doctor Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. Sadly, it is not, and was never owned by my Mott family.
Mott's strike ends
After 114 days the strike by workers against Mott's will end next week as workers return to work on day 120. The latest proposal does not contain wage cuts, but there are no wage increases during the three years of the contract. Pensions are retained for current workers, but new hires may not participate in the pension plan, although new hires will receive higher 401(k) contributions. The returning employees will also receive a $1,000 signing bonus.
Back to the table, Not!
It may be only a press release, but it was picked up as news and it conveys a powerful rebuttal to the union's posturing in the Mott's strike (as well as to Secretary of Labor Solis who suggested the parties need to come back to the bargaining table).
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
500 Coke employees lost their health insurance the day after they went on strike. The union has sued under ERISA , claiming the action wa...
-
Two weeks ago, a Florida man was arrested for logging on to his Facebook account and requesting that his estranged wife list him as a "...
-
The average cost of family health insurance coverage rose 3% to $13,770 in 2010, while at the same time the employee's share of the c...
-
UPDATE: There is pending legislation for major changes to the alimony statute in Massachusetts. The Alimony Reform Act of 2011 was filed on...
-
There are four house bills that propose changes to the current custody statute. However, H.1306 and H.2684 are practically the same, though...
-
Well kids I plan to scoot out of here shortly, to begin my long solemn weekend regimen of prayer , reflection , and expanding my abdomen , s...
-
We recently posted this answer on our Bankruptcy Blog and thought that it could be useful to our family law audience as well. Under the cur...
-
(BY HUGO) The U.S.A. Supreme Court decides today whether to reopen the original case and decree concerning the Chicago Ship and Sanitary Can...
-
(BY HUGO) A report from MARSH Canada, A Review of Water-Related Opportunities and Threats , outlines insurance issues in the sector to ensur...
-
If you live in Massachusetts, by now you've probably heard about Alimony Reform. Both the House and Senate have passed the Alimony Refo...