Saints quarterback Drew Brees is a member of the NFLPA executive committee. As such he speaks for the players union. NFL owners beat the drum about a broken compensation system while Brees essentially says player income is a percentage of revenues. Both team revenue and player salaries are going up. How is that broken? Aint' broke, don't fix it. Think strike - both sides have a lot to lose.

Mike Triplett has a great piece in the Times Picayune about the Saint's players comments on  the breakdown in negotiations for the new CBA. Saint's quarterback Drew Brees is quoted as are many others. The PR war has already started, but these Saints provide an articulate defense to the players position. A word of caution to the fan following this issue. Network reports on the lockout have every reason to be biased in favor of the owners. Not only do they owe the owners $4 billion if the games are not played, they have to negotiate television rights with those same owners. Expect the owners to get better than even treatment and coverage.

Drew Brees has penned an interesting piece in the Washington Post concerning American Needle v. NFL. Thats the case challenging the NFL's right to enter into an exclusive marketing arrangement for stuff with team logos. The small company challenging the NFL's exclusive arrangement with Reebok lost in the lower court which found no anti-trust violation in the deal because the NFL is essentially a single entity for marketing purposes. After the deal took effect the cost of a cap with a team logo increased by ten dollars. If you're thinking what does this have to do with employment law, Saint Drew explains. It seems the NFL is asking the Supreme Court to broaden the ruling. The league wants the Supreme Court to declare the NFL is a single entity for virtually every purpose, rather than 32 extremely competitive football teams. If that were the case, bye bye free agency and the many other advances players earned using the anti-trust laws. Oral argument is set for January 13, 2010.