Showing posts with label Bradley J. Schlozman. Show all posts
Judicial Spanking Week Continues!

Huge and well-deserved victory for our own David O. Markus as Judge Gold drops a bomb on Alex Acosta's office:
The judge reprimanded the two trial prosecutors, saying that along with Drug Enforcement Administration agent Christopher Wells, they “acted vexatiously and in bad faith” in prosecuting Dr. Ali Shaygan. Also reprimanded was assistant U.S. Attorney Karen Gilbert, the narcotics section chief.You can read the order here.
Gold called the secret taping of phone calls to Shaygan’s attorney and defense investigator by two informants was “profoundly disturbing.” He raised the specter of the recent dismissal of a conviction against former U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, because prosecutors in that case withheld key evidence.
The $601,795 covers court fees and lawyer costs dating from a superseding indictment filed by prosecutors in September.
“The order speaks for itself. We regret that any of this ever happened in the first place but we are grateful that Judge Gold took it seriously and did the right thing,” said Miami criminal defense attorney David O. Markus, the lead counsel for Shaygan. “Thank goodness that the conduct did not distract the jury from finding Dr. Shaygan not guilty of all 141 counts against him.
Miami attorneys Marc Seitles and Robin Kaplan served as co-counsels for the defense.
Alex has other not-so-great coverage in the DBR here.
I previously covered Alex's alleged supervision of rogue Christian Bradley Schlozman and his unsolicited intervention in the Ohio election process.
His defense on that -- that I was just informing those poor black voters about their legal rights -- is particularly lame.
I like Alex. He doesn't strike me as aggressively ideological, and his office is filled with many talented attorneys who take their charge as public servants seriously. And of course he is not solely responsible for this Judge Gold order.
But as I say about Frankie boy and 9th Circuit torture judge Jay Bybee, this stuff kinda matters.
It's easy to have integrity and to be highly ethical when you are not particularly pressed by a superior or government to do something possibly dubious or questionable. That's 98 percent of your life.
It's what you do in the other 2 percent that matters.
And that doesn't mean people don't make mistakes sometimes and can't ever do the right thing again. They do and can.
But if you are in denial mode about the original questionable action it is hard to move past it and for others to have confidence in your judgment in the future.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
500 Coke employees lost their health insurance the day after they went on strike. The union has sued under ERISA , claiming the action wa...
-
The average cost of family health insurance coverage rose 3% to $13,770 in 2010, while at the same time the employee's share of the c...
-
Two weeks ago, a Florida man was arrested for logging on to his Facebook account and requesting that his estranged wife list him as a "...
-
Well kids I plan to scoot out of here shortly, to begin my long solemn weekend regimen of prayer , reflection , and expanding my abdomen , s...
-
(BY HUGO) Linda Gyulai reports in the Montreal Gazette here that the City of Montreal and Génieau have begun arbitration to settle the com...
-
There are four house bills that propose changes to the current custody statute. However, H.1306 and H.2684 are practically the same, though...
-
According to a New York Times article , the New York State legislature recently approved legislation that would allow No-Fault divorces in N...
-
(BY HUGO) A report from MARSH Canada, A Review of Water-Related Opportunities and Threats , outlines insurance issues in the sector to ensur...
-
There are two ways to ask this question: Can I start dating while my divorce case is pending? and Should I start dating while my divorce cas...
-
UPDATE: There is pending legislation for major changes to the alimony statute in Massachusetts. The Alimony Reform Act of 2011 was filed on...