SFL Friday -- Pump It Up Edition.
Divorces are messy things.
The kids, the finances, the house, sometimes even the dog.
But who the hail cares about that stuff -- to me the most important issue is who gets custody of the x-rated pictures:
When a marriage goes bad, who gets the X-rated photos of the wife? In the case of Valeria Gentile and Erwin Cajamarca, the wife says she does.Hmm, Longwood.
She sued her soon-to-be-ex-husband last week in state circuit court in Sanford, accusing him of putting the photos on a Spanish-language porn site, distributing them via the Internet and, at times, using them during on-line sex chats.
The whole thing is humiliating, cruel and an invasion of her privacy, her suit alleges. Thousands of people have now seen her in a variety of sexual poses. She's demanding an unspecified amount of money.
Cajamarca, 39, an investment consultant, would not discuss the dispute, except to say that his estranged wife knew he was publishing some of the photos.
He took them with her consent before their marriage went sour, according to the suit.
So whose property are they?
They belong to both husband and wife, said Mitchel B. Krause, a Longwood divorce attorney.
This dispute, he said, it not uncommon among divorcing couples. Sometimes, ownership of these kinds of photos is one of the most contentious issues facing a divorcing couple, he said.
Usually, the spouse who'll be most embarrassed by them agrees to surrender other property to get them, he said.
"The husband will get the picture of the dog, the cat and the house and wedding photos, and the wife will get the other photos," he said.
You know, I know a very good attorney in Leesburg who might be just the guy to handle this case -- you should look him up.
Well, I don't know about you but I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired, so I am out of here for some early windsurfing.
Conditions appear to be very favorable.
On my plate for this weekend is going back to school, moving energy from my second chakra, and, as always, trying to keep kosher.
Have a great weekend everybody!
This entry was posted on at 10:44 AM and is filed under Friday, George L. Metcalfe, Mitchel B. Krause. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
Responding to a request from Congressman Darrell Issa (R. CA), David Berry, the Inspector General for the NLRB has determined Craig Becke...
-
The AFL-CIO blog claims a new study shows the excise tax on "Cadillac" health plans would affect significantly more non-union w...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...