Random Thoughts In My Head.
in Iqbal
Similar pages:
- Blog of law articles: Free PACER?
- Blog of law articles: Bobby Brochin Explains Iqbal (Did I Just Write That?)
- Blog of law articles: The Eleventh Circuit Goes Iqbal-Crazy!
- Blog of law articles: I've Got Nothing.
- Blog of law articles: Is Iqbal the New Twombly?
- Blog of law articles: Rule 8(a) Hates You For Your Freedoms.

I'm having some trouble organizing my thoughts this morning, so let me just lay out what's jogging around in my brain right now.....you guys tell me if any of this is somehow related:
You know there's something wrong with Iqbal when Judge Posner questions its application in run of the mill federal cases:
I've often wondered what would happen if some of my favorite cases were anthropomorphized into wrestlers and had to fight each other.In our initial thinking about the case, however, we were reluctant to endorse the district court's citation of the Supreme Court's decision in Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), fast becoming the citation du jour in Rule 12(b)(6) cases, as authority for the dismissal of this suit. The Court held that in complex litigation (the case itself was an antitrust suit) the defendant is not to be put to the cost of pretrial discovery - a cost that in complex litigation can be so steep as to coerce a settlement on terms favorable to the plaintiff even when his claim is very weak - unless the complaint says enough about the case to permit an inference that it may well have real merit. The present case, however, is not complex.
But Bell Atlantic was extended, a week after we heard oral argument in the present case, in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009) - over the dissent of Justice Souter, the author of the majority opinion in Bell Atlantic - to all cases, even a case (Iqbal itself) in which the court of appeals had ‘promise[d] petitioners minimally intrusive discovery.' Yet Iqbal is special in its own way, because the defendants had pleaded a defense of official immunity and the Court said the promise of minimally intrusive discovery ‘provides especially cold comfort in this pleading context, where we are impelled to give real content to the concept of qualified immunity for high-level officials who must be neither deterred nor detracted from vigorous performance of their duties.
So maybe neither Bell Atlantic nor Iqbal governs here. It doesn't matter. It is apparent from the complaint and the plaintiff's arguments, without reference to anything else, that his case has no merit.
I'm pretty sure Venetian Salami would beat the snot of out Hickman v. Taylor.
However, while being interviewed ringside by Gordon Solie, Venetian Salami was viciously attacked from behind with a folding chair by Professor Toru Tanaka's tag-team partner Chudasama, which inevitably sets up the feud match involving all three of them and that great patriotic superstar, American Pipe.
I can't believe a guy seriously made an entire career out of impersonating Jerry Lewis. RIP Sammy Petrillo.
Problem -- my deep reservoirs of knowledge concerning World War II, films, and the Marvel Universe are beginning to merge -- did Captain America really punch out Hitler or did that just happen in a Tarantino movie?
Triple-oy alert -- Robert Zemeckis is remaking Yellow Submarine.
God do I love Drew Barrymore. Related -- I really hate Justin Long.
Ok folks, it's finally happened -- I have become Larry King.
More related web entries for - Random Thoughts In My Head.:
- undefined
- Is Iqbal the New Twombly?
- Rule 8(a) Hates You For Your Freedoms.
- A Personal Confession.
- The Interesting But Really Long Life Story of Michael Chow
- All Hail Village Green Ad Hoc Committee On Rules And Procedures Preservation Society
- Professor Donald Jones Sues ATL!
- SFL Friday -- Happy Halloween, Plebes!
- Congress Held An Iqbal Party!
- Sign of the Times -- Robert Zarco Abandons Extravagant Travel Policy
- Your Obligatory Iqbal Update and Other Random Items.
- Six Reasons I Will Not Be Blogging This Morning.
- Checking Up on Mr. Chow.
This entry was posted on at 5:45 AM and is filed under Iqbal. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.
VIP Followers
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
The AFL-CIO blog claims a new study shows the excise tax on "Cadillac" health plans would affect significantly more non-union w...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...