One Court instead of Two for Domestic Abuse Cases in Norfolk County – A Pilot Program
Similar pages:
- Blog of law articles: Question of the Week: What is an Abuse Prevention Order?
- Blog of law articles: Can a Restraining Order be Permanent?
- Blog of law articles: How do I get protection from an abusive spouse?
- Blog of law articles: The Honeymooners' Divorce: Collaborative Law, Mediation or Litigation - Part III
- Blog of law articles: October is National Domestic Violence Awareness Month
- Blog of law articles: Is there a Criminal Record of a 209A Restraining Order?
EXAMPLE: Whitney and Bobby are married and live in Dedham. One night they get into a fight and Whitney calls the police. Bobby is not arrested but is escorted from the home by the police and Whitney is provided with an emergency 209A Order for Protection from Abuse (commonly called a Restraining Order). The Restraining Order requires that both Whitney and Bobby show up at the Dedham District Court the next day to go in front of a Judge who will decide whether the Restraining Order should be extended.
After a hearing the Judge extends the Restraining Order for two months ( “a cooling off period”). That afternoon, Whitney goes to the Norfolk Probate and Family Court in Canton and files a Complaint for Divorce. Whitney also files a Motion for Temporary Orders asking a Family Court Judge to give award her custody of the children and order Bobby to pay her child support.
At the hearing on Whitney’s Motion for Temporary Orders, Bobby asks for visitation because he hasn’t seen his children since the Restraining Order went into effect. The Probate Court Judge orders physical and legal custody to Whitney with a visitation schedule for Bobby.
Under the current rules, there are now two Orders from two different Courts that are different. The problem for Bobby is that the Dedham District Court Order is the one that the police will follow. If Bobby tries to pick up his children for visitation he may be arrested unless he and/or Whitney go to the Dedham District Court and ask the Court to amend the Restraining Order.
The pilot program would give the Norfolk Probate and Family Court Judge the power to transfer the Dedham District Court 209A Restraining Order case to the Norfolk Probate and Family Court. This means that when the Family Court Judge makes a decision it will apply in both cases and amendments can be made to the Restraining Order immediately to be consistent with the Probate Court orders.
This benefits Whitney and Bobby by having only one court for them to visit, allowing for less court hearings total, and by having one Judge who can hear all issues and make decisions that are consistent and take into account both the safety concerns of Whitney and the best interest of the children.
The full language of the Order can be viewed here. Under the pilot program, the transfer can be initiated by motion by either a party or sua sponte by the Probate and Family Court judge. The parties will have an opportunity to be heard on the question of transfer.
The pilot program will be for one year and will be reviewed after six months by the Chief Justices of the Probate and Family Court and the District Court.
More related web entries for - One Court instead of Two for Domestic Abuse Cases in Norfolk County – A Pilot Program:
- undefined
- October is National Domestic Violence Awareness Month
- Is there a Criminal Record of a 209A Restraining Order?
- Restraining Orders are not Force Fields
- Custody Reform: What is it?
- Follow Up Story: No-Fault Divorce is now the law in all 50 states!
- Can I start dating during my divorce?
- When can I (or will I) get re-married?
- Divorce or Long-Term Separation: A Comparison.
- Client Choice: Flat Fee vs. Hourly Rates
- Mediation, Collaborative Law or Litigation: What's your Vote?
- Divorce is not a Four Letter Word
- Equitable Division: This isn't Judge Solomon's Court
- This is your life, but it’s my job. And that’s a good thing.
- How should a Child's Age affect their Parenting Plan?
- Is Divorce different for Men & Women?
- Is a Friendly Divorce Possible?
- Will I be able to keep my health insurance after the divorce?
- Alimony Reform Act approved Unanimously by the House
- Protecting your Privacy in a Divorce. Who has access to your mail, e-mail, etc.?
- How much will my Divorce cost?
- 5 Worst Divorce Mistakes - MISTAKE #1 "My kids have a right to know what's happening."
- 5 Worst Divorce Mistakes - MISTAKE #2: "All of this is because of that slut!"
- 5 Worst Divorce Mistakes - MISTAKE #3: "Our friends should know my side of the story!"
- 5 Worst Divorce Mistakes - MISTAKE #4: "Do I have to tell the court about EVERYTHING?"
- What are the 5 Worst Mistakes People make in their Divorce case? MISTAKE #5: "I Want My Day in Court"
- Is No-Fault Divorce a Good Thing? It may soon be the law in all 50 states.
- 10 Do's and Don'ts for Divorce in the Internet Age
This entry was posted on at 6:08 AM and is filed under 209A, District Court, divorce, Norfolk County, paternity, pilot program, Probate and Family Court, restraining orders. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.
VIP Followers
Info recommended by:
Webpages of law
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
(BY HUGO) Environmental Defence Canada recently published a report, Down the Drain: Water Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin , that shows...
-
To paraphrase Mark Harris , it seems that Scott Rothstein continues to rule our world. Here's the latest: 1. Bill Scherer sues the fir...
-
(BY HUGO) The Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks has published 2 new project regulations . One is to amend the Regul...
-
(BY HUGO) On 27 October 2010, Professor Jake Peters from the USGS Georgia Water Science Centre will give a conference on inter-state tension...
-
The AFL-CIO blog claims a new study shows the excise tax on "Cadillac" health plans would affect significantly more non-union w...
-
Acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon has issued a report on social media cases. Anyone who fails to consider the NLRA in general and the...
-
So who else is going to the Federation Judicial Reception tonight: This year’s Judicial Reception will recognize three outstanding legal pr...
-
When I first read this story about a potential conflict of interest involving the "extremely Floridian" GrayRobinson that is bei...
-
My students and readers of this blog know my support for Dana Corp 's approach to ensure that employees' right to select union r...