World Gone Mad -- Attorney Sanctioned For Cancelling Depo On "Pretext"
Oh man what is the world coming to?
Good thing this judge does not preside in South Florida, or business litigation in this town would grind to an immediate halt:
"An attempt to gain leverage with respect to unrelated discovery issues"? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that what the art of deposition scheduling and cancelling is all about?A Southern District magistrate judge has sanctioned a lawyer who refused to attend a scheduled deposition in what the magistrate judge said "can only be construed as an attempt to gain leverage with respect to unrelated discovery issues."
Holding that attorney M. Douglas Haywoode's explanation for canceling the deposition "does not withstand scrutiny," Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV invoked Rule 30(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to award costs, including attorney's fees, against Mr. Haywoode.
Here's the details:
Exactly -- nicely done!On April 19, Mr. Haywoode notified one of the defendants' lawyers, Mr. Traub, that he would not attend because of "obstructions in the discovery process."
Mr. Haywoode further explained that he was objecting to the defendants' failure to provide documents that his litigation team had reviewed and found relevant.
Magistrate Judge Francis noted that Mr. Haywoode already had canceled and rescheduled the deposition at issue once before. And he observed that the attempt to cancel a second time was made "when it was impossible to seek court intervention."
Boy if gamesmanship in the discovery process were to be sanctionable, we might actually have to exchange documents and information -- some if it potentially harmful to our case. What fun is that?
Let me think of some things I have cancelled on pretextual grounds:
DepositionsI'm sure there are others.....
Hearings
Trials
Meetings
Conference calls
Document production
Lunch dates with Steve Zack
Weddings
This entry was posted on at 11:35 AM and is filed under attorney misconduct, depositions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
VIP Followers
Popular entries
-
Several in-the-know readers have passed along an incendiary anonymous memo making the rounds among administrators and trustees regarding fin...
-
UPDATE: There is pending legislation for major changes to the alimony statute in Massachusetts. The Alimony Reform Act of 2011 was filed on...
-
500 Coke employees lost their health insurance the day after they went on strike. The union has sued under ERISA , claiming the action wa...
-
Two weeks ago, a Florida man was arrested for logging on to his Facebook account and requesting that his estranged wife list him as a "...
-
Medical marijuana legal in some states, is creating some employment law problems . Seems employees with prescriptions for medicinal use of ...
-
Today marks day 100 of the Mott's strike . The pro-union writer, Michael Winship, does a pretty good job of outlining the economics of ...
-
This business owner's letter to the editor makes a strong case for preservation of the secret ballot for determining a union's maj...
-
Here is another example (the leather goods industry) of the absolute collapse of domestic manufacturing causing the elimination of high pa...
-
Responding to a request from Congressman Darrell Issa (R. CA), David Berry, the Inspector General for the NLRB has determined Craig Becke...
-
Attorney Kelsey will be appearing on Money Matters with Scottie McCall on Friday, April 30, 2010 at 3:30 P.M. Attorney Kelsey will discuss...
# by Franchise Litigation - December 12, 2011 at 2:39 AM
An action passed in court to implement a particular right. The procedure is bringing a lawsuit in and of itself. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.